try { LinqToSqlDemoDataContext dataContext = new LinqToSqlDemoDataContext(); Order order1 = dataContext.Orders.Single(o => o.OrderID == 1); Order order2 = dataContext.Orders.Single(o => o.OrderID == 2); Order order3 = dataContext.Orders.Single(o => o.OrderID == 3); Console.WriteLine('Order 1: ' + order1.Introduction); Console.WriteLine('Order 2: ' + order2.Introduction); Console.WriteLine('Order 3: ' + order3.Introduction); Console.WriteLine(); order1.Introduction = 'Order 1 modified.'; order2.Introduction = 'Order 2 modified.'; order3.Introduction = 'Order 3 modified.'; dataContext.Log = Console.Out; // 在下面的語句上設置一個斷點 dataContext.SubmitChanges(); } catch (ChangeConflictException e) { Console.WriteLine('---------- ' + e.Message + ' ----------'); } LinqToSqlDemoDataContext db = new LinqToSqlDemoDataContext(); Order o1 = db.Orders.Single(o => o.OrderID == 1); Order o2 = db.Orders.Single(o => o.OrderID == 2); Order o3 = db.Orders.Single(o => o.OrderID == 3); Console.WriteLine('Order 1: ' + o1.Introduction); Console.WriteLine('Order 2: ' + o2.Introduction); Console.WriteLine('Order 3: ' + o3.Introduction); Console.ReadLine();
OrderID Name Introduction record_version 1 Order 1 This is order 1 <Binary data> 2 Order 2 This is order 2 <Binary data> 3 Order 3 This is order 3 <Binary data>
UPDATE Order SET OrderID = "New Order 2" WHERE OrderID = 2
Order 1: This is order 1 Order 2: This is order 2 Order 3: This is order 3 UPDATE [dbo].[Order] SET [Introduction] = @p2 WHERE ([OrderID] = @p0) AND ([record_version] = @p1) SELECT [t1].[record_version] FROM [dbo].[Order] AS [t1] WHERE ((@@ROWCOUNT) > 0) AND ([t1].[OrderID] = @p3) -- @p0: Input Int (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [1] -- @p1: Input Timestamp (Size = 8; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [SqlBinary(8)] -- @p2: Input NVarChar (Size = 26; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [Order 1 modified.] -- @p3: Input Int (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [1] -- Context: SqlProvider(Sql2005) Model: AttributedMetaModel Build: 3.5.21022.8 UPDATE [dbo].[Order] SET [Introduction] = @p2 WHERE ([OrderID] = @p0) AND ([record_version] = @p1) SELECT [t1].[record_version] FROM [dbo].[Order] AS [t1] WHERE ((@@ROWCOUNT) > 0) AND ([t1].[OrderID] = @p3) -- @p0: Input Int (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [2] -- @p1: Input Timestamp (Size = 8; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [SqlBinary(8)] -- @p2: Input NVarChar (Size = 26; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [Order 2 modified.] -- @p3: Input Int (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [2] -- Context: SqlProvider(Sql2005) Model: AttributedMetaModel Build: 3.5.21022.8 ---------- 1 of 2 updates failed. ---------- Order 1: This is order 1 Order 2: This is order 2 Order 3: This is order 3
也就是說,第一次更新被回滾了。這自然是事務的作用。在調用(默認的) SubmitChanges方法時,Linq to Sql會把所有的更新放在同一個事務中,因此它們“共同進退”。但是由于業務需求不同,有時候我們不希望某條記錄的沖突導致了所有更新失敗。自然, Linq to Sql也提供了這個方面的控制。在下一篇文章中,我們就來看一下Linq to Sql中與樂觀并發控制有關的事務問題,以及出現并發沖突之后的解決方式。拼吾愛
1
延伸閱讀
文章來源于領測軟件測試網 http://www.kjueaiud.com/