Environment Coverage Comparison: Common environments shared by both WinRunner and QuickTest Pro: Web-Related Environments IE, Netscape, AOL JDK, Java Foundation Classes, AWT Sym ant ec Vis" name="description" />

  • <ruby id="5koa6"></ruby>
    <ruby id="5koa6"><option id="5koa6"><thead id="5koa6"></thead></option></ruby>

    <progress id="5koa6"></progress>

  • <strong id="5koa6"></strong>
  • 來談談WinRunner和QTP的區別

    發表于:2007-04-22來源:作者:點擊數: 標簽:qtpwinrunner談談區別
    WinRunner Compared to QuickTest Pro MI LY: Arial"> Environment Coverage Comparison: Common environments shared by both WinRunner and QuickTest Pro: Web-Related Environments IE, Netscape, AOL JDK, Java Foundation Classes, AWT Sym ant ec Vis

    WinRunner Compared to QuickTest Pro

    MILY: Arial"> Environment Coverage Comparison:

           *      Common environments shared by both WinRunner and QuickTest Pro:

    Web-Related Environments

    IE, Netscape, AOL

     

    JDK, Java Foundation Classes, AWT

     

    Symantec Visual Café

     

    ActiveX Controls

    ERP/CRM

    Oracle: Jinitiator, 11i, NCA

    Custom Client Server

    Windows

     

    C++/C

     

    Visual Basic

    Operating Systems

    Windows 98, 2000, NT, ME, XP

    Legacy

    3270, 5250 Emulators

     

    VT100

       *      WinRunner Only Environments:

    Custom Client/Server

    PowerBuilder

     

    Forte

     

    Delphi

     

    Centura

     

    Stingray

     

    SmallTalk

    ERP/CRM

    Baan

     

    PeopleSoft Windows

     

    Siebel 5, 6 GUI Clients

     

    Oracle GUI Forms

    *      QuickTest Pro Only Environments:

    ERP/CRM

    SAP

     

    Siebel 7.x

     

    PeopleSoft 8.x

    .Net

    WinForms

     

    WebForms

     

    .Net controls

    Web Services

    XML, HTTP

     

    WSDL, SOAP

     

    J2EE, .Net

    Multimedia

    RealAudio/Video

     

    Flash

     Feature Comparison:

    *      Common features found in both WinRunner and QuickTest Pro:

    Record/Replay

    ODBC & Excel Connectivity

    Code Editor & Debugger

    Recovery Manager

    Shared Object Repository

    Rapid Object Import

    Numerous Checkpoints

    Analog

    scrīpt & Function Libraries

     

       *      WinRunner Only Environments:

    Function Generator

    Database Integration

    Run Wizard

    TSL

    MDI

     

    *      QuickTest Pro Only Environments:

    ActiveScreen

    TestGuard

    Tree View

    scrīptFusion

    Data Table

    VBscrīpt

    Function Generator*

    (coming in v7.0)

    Run Wizard*

    (coming in v7.0)

        WinRunner和Quick Test Professional(簡稱QTP)都是MERCURY公司開發的非常強大功能自動化測試工具,從時間上來看,WinRunner在1995年便已經推出,而QTP直到2002年才正式推出。

    我想從以下幾點來談談我個人的看法,這里只列出它們兩者的不同點:

    1.從界面來看:WinRunner只有一個顯示腳本的界面,而QTP的Kyword View 、Expert View、Data Table、Active Screen四個界面可以顯示在同一個窗口,在腳本回放時讓人可以時時刻刻了解到腳本運行的情況,雖然這些功能WinRunner都可以實現,但相比較下 QTP更直觀、更好;

    2.從支持的語言來看:如上表列出的,兩者有所不同,在這我就不再列出;

    3.從生成的腳本來看:WinRunner生成的是TSL腳本,這是MI公司獨有的語言,是一種類C語言,而QTP 生成的是VBscrīpt,從編程能力上,WinRunner更勝一籌,因為它擁有相當豐富的C語言函數庫,相對而言QTP則更顯得大眾化,它面向的是沒有太多技術背景和編程經驗的測試人員;

    4.從適用范圍來看:WinRunner比較適用于C/S架構軟件,而QTP雖然對于C/S架構的也適用,但對于B/S架構的適用性更剩一籌;

    5.QTP8.0具有的一大特性:關鍵字驅動測試(keyword-driven testing),這點我實踐的比較少,理解不是很深,希望能和大家共同討論;

        具體選用那種工具,應該根據公司自身的情況來定。這些只是個人理解,如果有不完整或者不對的地方,歡迎大家跟帖討論!

    原文轉自:http://www.kjueaiud.com

    老湿亚洲永久精品ww47香蕉图片_日韩欧美中文字幕北美法律_国产AV永久无码天堂影院_久久婷婷综合色丁香五月

  • <ruby id="5koa6"></ruby>
    <ruby id="5koa6"><option id="5koa6"><thead id="5koa6"></thead></option></ruby>

    <progress id="5koa6"></progress>

  • <strong id="5koa6"></strong>